On Thursday 19 September 2002 3:07 am, Peter Lipa wrote: > Hi Gerard, > Thanks for the updated release and your progress on PyCute - looks great > (after a few minutes of testing)! > > Here is some feedback: > I built the win32 commercial Qt3.05 version > PyQwt-sip332_20020807-Qt-305.win32-py2.2.exe and corresponding .zip with no > problems at the > compile and packaging steps. (However I have runtime problems which I > didn't have with the previous version - see below). > I only had to uncomment the two lines: > # is this true? > qt_library_name = 'qt-mt305' > extra_version = '-Qt-305' > in the pyqt_support.py (yes, you guesset trolltech's naming convetion > correctly on windows) > > I am happy to send you the the binary PyQwt windows installer and zip > builds for the Qt3.0.5 commercial if you want to put them on your website. > For a binary-only release, according the the commercial qt license, I see > no problem with sending you also the qt-mt305.dll (without the souce of > course) so you can run and test the commercial version of the win32 PyQwt > package yourself.
Then you need to read your Qt license more closely. Gerard would then become a developer as far as Trolltech (and I) were concerned and would need a commercial Qt license (and a commercial PyQt license of course). When I've been in this situation in the past, it's been done with me being given a remote login to the "donor's" development system, and I've asked for confirmation in writing that the "donor" has the necessary Qt commercial license in place. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
