On Saturday 21 September 2002 1:43 am, Greg Fortune wrote: > <snip> > > > > I guess this is where my main concern lies... By using PyQt and > > > distributing a library that allows the user to develop applications > > > using Qt, I'm clearly violating Qt's license. It would seem this would > > > be true for *any* interpreted language and even any application that > > > provides signifigant scripting capabilities, etc.... > > > > I'll try again. You are not distributing a library, you are distributing > > a package. That package includes the library. So long as that package > > also includes an EULA that states what the user is, and is not, allowed > > to do with the library then (in my opinion - and it's only my opinion) > > you are not violating your Qt license. If you want your users to be able > > to use the library to provide access to the Qt API then they need their > > own copy of Qt commercial. > > Good, that would be a simple solution. I'll contact trolltech seperately > to make sure this is acceptable... If anyone else is interested in the > response (ie, what are the developer's obligations when using an > interpreted language), let me know and I'll forward the respone when I get > it.
I'm having a discussion with Eirik at the moment. Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
