Hi Marc, On Tuesday 22 October 2002 10:54, Marc Schmitt wrote: > I'd like to start a discussion about those points : > > Where to place sip, PyQt and PyKDE related material. This means sources, > patches, packages, docs, examples, ... Currently sources are on riverbank, > some packages on sf, some on lisa-gmbh.de. Patches seem to be nowhere, > examples within the sources. > Wouldn't it be best to unify (or maximal dualify) the places where we > collect the stuff ?
As far as official releases are concerned, this should be decided by Phil and Jim. I wouldn't mind to be linked on their sites, and willing to take over some organizational tasks on Sourceforge/Freshmeat. In my opinion, we should crosslink the resources, and try to get more public attention with freshmeat entries. I thought about publishing the rpm availability on Freshmeat, but hesitated to not interfere on such actions with our masters. Phil, Jim, opinions? > What about packaging policy ? To me this means, how to split packages. For > SuSE 8.0 I made -devel and -doc packages, for 8.1 I merged everything > together reflect the source structure : There are only three packages, sip, > PyQt and PyKDE left. Each contains all of the sources stuff, like libs, > docs, examples and sips. IMHO we should provide three super-spec, that > everyone can use for every distribution. You convinced me, that "the simpler, the better" approach is far superior, and recreated the rpms to conform with it. I will try to convince Adrian Schroeter, the SuSE package maintainer, to create similar package layouts. > -Marc Hans-Peter _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
