On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Graham Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems a bit US-centric tho' (c.f. the crypto > clauses and mention of "the government')
All your documentation are belong to us. The crypto clause is a bit over the top considering that standard web encryption is not high-level enough to trigger the export restrictions. In any case it should say the US government because just "government" is meaningless. Although it does imply the agreement is made in Virginia, and thus subject to Virginia's (and the US's) jurisdiction. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
