On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <jonat...@findmeon.com> wrote:
> That pattern / functionality is great.  I'm just talking about
> proactively saying "this name space is reserved for plugins, this
> namespace for projects - you can rest assured that as Pyramid grows
> and new functionality is added, you will not be affected as long as
> you stay within that container".  Right now, request.foo is a bit of a
> lottery -- from my perspective, chances are you won't add anything to
> Pyramid over there, but its not an explicit/futureproof property.

I think it's cool that Pyramid provides a way to do it, but I don't
think layering that opinion on top belongs in the core.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to