On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 22:07 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > Why choose a non-commercial license[1]? This has the disadvantage of > disallowing, for example, Debian to distribute it[2], which would be > nice. > > [1]: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ > [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640780. >
At this point I'd like to change the docs license to a free license, TBH. I had a delusion at some point that we'd need to protect it from publishing shops that just scrape existing free docs and sell books based on those docs without contributing anything back to the community, which would compete with book sales from folks who do, but I think the point is probably moot. It would be easiest to give the docs the same license as the code, I guess, although I'd be interested in hearing other opinions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
