On Apr 30, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, James Gardner wrote: >> I've added two modules to webhelpers and incremented the version >> number >> to 0.1.1, so if you do make a release that would be cool. Are you >> planning on implementing the scriptaculous command to copy the files >> into the users Pylons directory or should I press ahead and write >> middleware in webhelpers.middleware that can go after staticapp in >> the >> cascade and load the files straight from webhelpers? Which do you >> think >> is the better approach? If you don't want the scriptaculous >> command we >> should probably remove it. > > I vote for the latter, so that Pylons authors don't have to know or > care > about it.
I'm somewhat more in favor of a command to copy them into your current project, mainly since I don't want to keep adding bits of function overhead constantly thats easily solved by a one-time copy command. While one of these is unlikely to make a difference, it sets a precedence for throwing middleware at a problem that PasteScript handles well... copying resources into project directories. Cheers, Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
