Slightly off topic: OR mappers like SQLAlchemy have come a long way in recent years. They've made it a lot easier to use RDBMSs without writing SQL, etc. Since the benefits of an RDBMS such as on-the-server queries are so great, and since the drawbacks are now far fewer because SQLAlchemy is so mature, I wonder what the draw for Durus is? I mean it's cool and all, but it seems like you have to sacrifice a lot to use it. I guess if your dataset is small enough, perhaps the ease of use issues outweigh the other drawbacks. :-/
Happy Hacking! -jj > Dear all, > > I've just read the "Getting Started" page and got very interested in > Pylons. The re-use philosophy is great and I like the ease of > distribution. I also congratulate the project for this strong and > active community. > > Now my question. Is it possible to use Durus, the object database, > instead of the usual relational databases? I'm interested in using an > object database in a concrete project and I'm trying to find a > framework that would be flexible enough for that. (I didn't like > Quixote's implementation.) Note that my motivation is simply > experimentation, I'm not driven by performance or stability. > > I assume I would have to do the dirty work by myself, but could you > point me to the right direction? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
