"Shannon -jj Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This question sounds familiar, so I wonder if I've already talked to > you.
Yeah, you pointed out that HTTP Auth won't do what I need -- hence my interest in choosing between Barrel and AuthKit. (or perhaps something else). > * As for a standard system, we decided to build our own on top of > paste.auth.cookie. I would have loved to use an existing system, but > I didn't see any clear winners. :-/ Have a look through all the > paste.auth stuff at the very least. AuthKit's based on paste.auth and has lots of nice features and bunches of examples in the docs so I think I'll look at that first. If others have examples of using Barrels in pylons I'd love to see them. Thanks again. ---------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
