On Jan 7, 2007, at 6:05 PM, TazzleNack wrote:
Webware knocked Zope off the throne, CherryPy knocked Webware (with
help from Quixote), TG knocked CherryPy, Django and TG are
neck-in-neck now, who knows who will be top dog next year?
I'm not sure I'd agree about TG knocking out CherryPy. It's built on
CherryPy so ipso facto, there's nothing in TG that can't be built on
CherryPy. To boot, there's a new version (3.0) of CherryPy that
improves greatly on the things TG used. Unfortunately, being a major
release, there are incompatibilities and TG is going to be a pain to
move to 3.0. CherryPy 3.0 is much more flexible and building another
TG-like stack on top of it will be easier and the result better,
faster, and, hopefully, less crufty.
Also, with CherryPy also being fully WSGI compliant, I'm hoping for a
more plug-in able stack all the way up and down.
Currently, I'm developing a fairly straight-forward application and
have been able to get it running under:
TG
Pylons
CherryPy 3.0
Colubrid
and I'm not having to change anything other than the glue layer
(imports and hand-off, mostly) to get it to work under any of them.
At a certain level, you hand your object off to the stack and things
just get delegated properly.
Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
S
Stephen F. Steiner
Integrated Development Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.integrateddevcorp.com
(603)433-1232
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
