at this point the biggest help would be for people to use the code [1]
and submit issues/patches when they run into something.  However,
understand that the interface is a little wobbly.  I do plan on
committing to a final release before pycon (not committing to the
features in that release, just to an "interface that will be
supported")

[1] the first generation of fixture (testtools.fixtures) is used
internally at my company on a large test suite for ETL processing
(~240 tests) but I haven't had the opportunity to port that suite to
use the new fixture module yet.

On 1/30/07, Carlo Sogono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kumar, good stuff. I'm going to look into fixture within the next few
> weeks and see how I can help out. I wouldn't consider myself an advanced
> Python developer though...
>
> Would be nice to go to PyCon but I live down under in Sydney =( but
> doubt my employer would pay for me to fly halfway around the world. I
> work for a hosting company and all our web applications are written in
> Python (website, control panels, internal admin system, credit card
> payment interfaces for merchants, etc). At the moment we're slowly
> moving towards test-driven development so I'm really keen on getting a
> proper test framework going. Let me know if you need any sort of help
> with fixture...
>
> Cheers,
> Carlo
>
> PS. Does anyone want to sponsor me a plane ticket to PyCon? =D
>
>
> Kumar McMillan wrote:
> > This isn't connected specifically to pylons, but I've been working on
> > a module named "fixture" to test in ways like how you're talking
> > about: to assert that a program interacts appropriately with its data
> > model.
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/fixture/
> >
> > unfortunately there aren't any docs online yet and the docstrings in
> > the code are still a little sparse.
> >
> > However, it is a fairly simple idea: you define classes descending
> > from fixture.DataSet to declare data ... then you use a Fixture
> > instance that knows how to load that data.  For example:
> >
> > from fixture import DataSet, Fixture
> > class EmployeesData(DataSet):
> >     def data(self):
> >         return [('bob', dict(username='bob', password='bobs_pzwrd'))]
> >
> > from fixture.loader import SqlAlchemyLoader
> > from yourmappers import Employees # just one way, putting in global scope
> >
> > db = Fixture(loader=SqlAlchemyLoader(env=globals()))
> >
> > @db.with_data(EmployeesData)
> > def test_login(data):
> >     assert login(data.bob.username, "secret-password")
> >
> > ... that sort of glosses over how sqlalchemy mappers are discovered,
> > how Fixture.Data instances are delivered to tests, and what-not.  And
> > this code may change because I think I will merge Fixture and Loader
> > definitions into one.  In other words, this is still highly
> > experimental!
> >
> > FYI: I will be presenting on this module at pycon:
> > http://farmdev.com/thoughts/3/you-vs-the-real-world-testing-with-fixtures-coming-soon-/
> >
> > -Kumar
> >
> > On 1/29/07, Carlo Sogono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Stephen F. Steiner wrote:
> >>> We just have the test harness only access the 'dummy' database.
> >>>
> >>> The test suite clears out the 'dummy' database, then fills it with known
> >>> data (which we store in memory for quick compares).
> >>>
> >>> Then, we run the data sucking portion of the live code against the
> >>> 'dummy' database.
> >>>
> >>> Compare to the stored data; they'd better match!
> >>>
> >>> None of that really has anything to do with Pylons specifically since
> >>> the data sucking code only provides data for the front end.
> >> Ok, so on a more specific note, how people here manage their test
> >> databases? How do you create a dummy/temporary database in fixture,
> >> populate data, do tests, then cleanup? How do I do this with PostgreSQL?
> >> There seems to be no doco on this whatsoever online...
> >>
> >> If someone teaches me, I'll make the doco myself for everyone else to use.
> >>
> >> Carlo
> >>
> >>> Testing the front end is another issue altogether.
> >>>
> >>> If I understand your situation, it should be pretty simple to say "For
> >>> this data, we expect this front end output."
> >>>
> >>> If you make sure your test data includes data that will provoke any
> >>> fixed bugs, to make sure they're fixed (and stay fixed!), you should be
> >>> all set.
> >>>
> >>> S
> >>>
> >>> Stephen F. Steiner
> >>> Integrated Development Corporation
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> www.integrateddevcorp.com  <http://www.integrateddevcorp.com>
> >>> (603)433-1232
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to