Of all the apache setups, proxying is by far the simplest, and with Apache 2.2 proxy ajp is faster then http Jose
Max Ischenko wrote: > > On Feb 19, 12:21 am, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm curious as to why anyone would want to use FastCGI in the first >> place if proxying is available? Implementation wise, there's very >> little reason why FastCGI would be markedly faster or slower than the >> HTTP protocol. >> > > May be due to lack of appropriate knowledge? > > For instance, official Pylons deployment docs talks about FastCGI plus > Apache option only. Pylons wiki lists more deployment option but I am > not sure whether it covers proxying setup either (I am not sure what > is this really). > > Max. > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
