On May 11, 11:04 am, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If others are happy with the API as it is I'd be happy to see it
> included as an alternative module in the webhelpers.
I'm happy with it so far. ;-)
Though I have not tested it yet with regard to scalability in
practice, a big bonus is its good documentation. I had similar
problems with the built-in paginator as Christoph because I was not
exactly sure what to do with it. That's not bashing the WebHelpers
documentation - I know we only have so much time.
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
