On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a lot of opinions being thrown about as if they're the > absolute truth, and I'm afraid it may be confusing people.
Yeah, like saying that modwsgi + Apache are bad... > I can't > speak officially for Pylons (only Ben can), but I can say that Pylons > has been deployed on PasteHTTPServer, CherryPy, mod_wsgi, mod_proxy, > nginx, and others, and all have been stable and are reasonable > choices. Yes I'm aware of that, I did use PasteHTTPServer in production for a while. What I was trying to say is that there are better options if we talk about scaling or performances (what Tycon was talking about all along) > It's not true that "embedded mode is bad", "daemon mode is > even more stupid", or "Paste and CP3 are not meant to be used in the > deployment phase" (especially CP3). They may be too underperformant > for certain situations, but that does not make them bad across the > board even if certain people think so. I don't think they are bad, that's for sure > The argument against PasteHTTPServer and CherryPy3 seems to be > efficiency. The arguments against mod_wsgi and daemon mode seem to be > ideological. (And I'm lost now: if you don't have mod_wsgi and you > don't have an application daemon, what other choice is there?) Asynchronous web servers I guess -- Lawrence, http://oluyede.org - http://twitter.com/lawrenceoluyede "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it" - Upton Sinclair --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
