Much appreciated the feedback from all. Really helpful. I am going to probably hook in the Twisted WSGI adapter with pylons and let you guys know how well its goes. Yes there will be alot of traffic. I did like the interfaces for communication within Twisted and how when looking at it just from an implementation view point it looked like it would fit well with Pylons. However if there is any performance hit, then I wont hesitate in pulling the trigger on it.
Much appreciated, Gazza On Sep 3, 6:44 pm, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Brian O'Connor<[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm no twisted expert but I think you can use deferred threads to avoid > > blocking > > The Twisted WSGI adapter assumes the application will block and runs > it in a separate thread, so you don't have to worry about blocking. > It will tell Twisted when the answer is ready. > > -- > Mike Orr <[email protected]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
