On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Vanasco <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wait... am I to read this that traversal searches down for success > (A>B>C>D>E) and not up for failure (!E>!D>!C>!B>!A)? > > Are there no hooks to support caching for parent levels? > Pyramid's traverser is your hook. You can completely replace it. The traverser that is there solves the 90% issues but is explicitly not written to have further hooks. The traversal API surface [1] is incredibly tiny so it is simple to write your own in any way you wish without worrying about that API breaking in the future. [1] http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/1.5-branch/narr/hooks.html#changing-the-traverser -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
