But don't forget the "for the impatient..." instructions ;) Mike
Andi Vajda <va...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote: > >> : This is the way it used to be. In the interest of better maintenance by >> : avoiding duplication and to have nicer presentation than plain text, I >> : moved all the docs to the web site. That site's sources are all in svn >> >> I'm not advocating duplication -- and i agree HTML based docs tend to be >> easier to read. I'm just suggesting that a "snapshot" of the HTML docs be >> included future releases. (this is along the same lines as what some of >> the other subprojects do) > > Or heck, I can even include the entire site in HTML format, it's not that > big, and change the README and INSTALL files to point at the local, offline, > versions. > > Andi.. > >
