Hi Phil, On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Phil wrote:
Great - I've attached a one-line change that outputs the missing info to stdout. I haven't added a command line switch at this stage as there is no functional change to the output - just an extra line of logging.
Yes, a flag is not necessary for this change.
Note this is necessary because although the program already outputs the setup args which are also required, the Extension class doesn't render its args as text on printing the setup args, so I also need to output the inputs to the Extension so that I can capture all the inputs to setup(). This would be hugely useful for me if we could even this simple change.
I incorporated your change and committed into rev 1887063.
I will look at automating the full generation of a source package, and adding an optional switch to control this - but this is a larger undertaking, so I'll have to add it to the to-do list. I'll let you know when I have had a chance to implement this.
Great, thank you ! Andi..
