Hello, Andi.

Hmmm. Wait a minute... It shows 0.9.7! WTF.
Oh yes. Hehe.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ find /usr/ -name '*PyLuce*'
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/PyLucene.py
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/_PyLucene.so
/usr/lib/python2.4/PyLucene.py
/usr/lib/python2.4/_PyLucene.so
/usr/lib/python2.4/PyLucene.pyc

Old version was in the wrong place..

Thanks, Andi! you pointed me into my mistake :)

BTW, your last fix about release of object works like a charm!
No crashes for last 3 days.

AV> Are you sure you're running the correct version of PyLucene ?
AV> What is the value of the PyLucene.VERSION variable ?

AV> Andi..

AV> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Yura Smolsky wrote:

>> Hello, Yura.
>>
>> its pretty weird. I still has this bug with Debian Linux kernel 2.6.11, but 
>> code
>> work fine with RedHat Linux 2.4.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> YS> Hello, Andi.
>>
>> YS> I use gcc of 4.0.1 version for PyLucene. Should I build Python with
>> YS> CVS version of GCC?
>>
>> AV>> It could be that you're using the wrong version of the compiler. It 
>> needs to
>> be version >>> 3.4.1 ?
>>
>> AV>> Andi..
>>
>>>>> Hello, Andi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I know that code is not OS specific... But I have checked again
>>>>> this bug. It appears on Debian linux and on Red Hat it works likes a
>>>>> charm.
>>>>> I have tested code on 2 Debian boxes and 3 RedHat ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am wondering, maybe I miss something?.. Or could differences exist
>>>>> in any behavior of operation systems?
>>>>>
>>>>> I know, that my question is very weird and maybe.. a little stupid :)
>>>>> I am confused about this bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> AV> The reason this bug was happening was because of a deadlock situation 
>>>>> between
>>>>> AV> python threads who call into java and back into python and threads 
>>>>> created
>>>>> AV> from java (ParallelMultiSearcher does that) that call into python.
>>>>> AV> This was fixed in 0.9.8 where all calls from python to java release 
>>>>> the python
>>>>> AV> GIL (global interpreter lock) and reacquire it when calling back from 
>>>>> java
>>>>> AV> into python. This is not OS specific.
>>>>>
>>>>> AV> Andi..
>>>>>
>>>>> AV> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Yura Smolsky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello, Andi Vajda.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AV> Great, this would get us one step closer to a 1.0 release !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andi, I have that problem appeared again. It works great on Windows
>>>>>>> platform, and it worked good on RedHat Linux.
>>>>>>> But when we migrated to Debian with kernel 2.6.11 the
>>>>>>> problem has appeared again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you suggest us how to detect the real reason of this bug with hits
>>>>>>> on Debian Linux?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------- Forward Message ----------
>>>>>>> From:   Yura Smolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>> To:     [email protected]
>>>>>>> CC:
>>>>>>> Time:   Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:28:04 -0600
>>>>>>> Subj:   [pylucene-dev] ParallelMultiSearcher and Hits.doc(i)
>>>>>>> Attach: RemoteSearcherBad.py, ?????.txt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have noticed that ParallelMultiSearcher does not return correct Hits
>>>>>>> object when we use custom implemented Searchable, but
>>>>>>> MultiSearcher return correct one.
>>>>>>> "Correct" object Hits object means that it can return documents more
>>>>>>> than 100th.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I cannot get documents more than 100th from Hits object returned
>>>>>>> by ParallelMultiSearcher (with custom implemented Searchable object).
>>>>>>> When It cannot return needed object it loops forever, it does not
>>>>>>> return control outside Hits.doc(i) method.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I provide attach file which can easily reproduce the situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yura Smolsky.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------- End of Forward ----------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yura Smolsky,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yura Smolsky.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> YS> Yura Smolsky.
>>
>>
>> YS> _______________________________________________
>> YS> pylucene-dev mailing list
>> YS> [email protected]
>> YS> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yura Smolsky.
>>
>>
>>




Yura Smolsky.


_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev

Reply via email to