On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 03:00:19PM -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
> I guess you didn't read past the PyCON 2005 presentation ?
My mistake. I *did* read past the PyCON 2005 presentation, but I didn't
realize that the API section was not an appendix to the PyCON paper.
I suggest splitting README into three different files. You could
call them:
README
doc/pycon-presentation.txt
doc/pylucene-api.txt
> > But since you mention it, the README file has not been adapted
> > to Lucene 2.0.
> Would you like to list the errors you found ?
> Or better yet, send in corrections ?
The section begins:
API documentation for PyLucene
------------------------------
PyLucene is currently built against Java Lucene 1.4.3 and all its APIs
except for the RemoteSearchable class are supported (patches are welcome).
I didn't look very carefully after this for discrepancies with Lucene 2.0,
since it is described as Lucene 1.4.3.
But since you ask for errors, the grammar in this sentence is confusing.
You could say:
PyLucene is currently built from Java Lucene 1.4.3. It supports
the entire Lucene API, except for the RemoteSearchable class.
(Contributed patches and extensions are most welcome.)
> That is not a "Lucene in Action" sample, not even a PyLucene sample.
> Still, would you like to send in a patch to fix it ?
I don't know how to fix it, because I am just learning the PyLucene 2.0
interface myself. It's hard to find documentation.
--
/\ Greg Kuperberg (UC Davis)
/ \ Home page: http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~greg/
\ / Visit the Math ArXiv Front at http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/
\/ * All the math that's fit to e-print *
_______________________________________________
pylucene-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
