Sorry, I meant Andi - I can't type. ===8<==============Original message text=============== Hello Andi,
> I'm afraid that going the Lucy route is the same tradeoff: a port, diverging > from Java Lucene, with its own set of bugs, always behind Lucene core > development. Well understood. > Lucy, however, is written in C and could gain significant momentum by serving > as a base for all other such wrapper ports (Python, Ruby, Perl, Lisp, etc...) > Time should tell... Lucy's author said in Lucy list that it won't be available until a few months later. So yeah, we'll see. BTW David, is there a list of classes that PyLucene didn't implement? For example, is CJKAnalyzer available in PyLucene? Jack __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
