Hello, Andi. >> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file >> src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexFileNameFilter.java.rej >> patching file src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/AbstractField.java >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 15. >> Hunk #2 FAILED at 272.
AV> I don't have this problem, it patches fine for me. AV> Are you sure your patches.analyzers file looks like this ? AV> http://svn.osafoundation.org/pylucene/trunk/patches.analyzers yes. it is exactly the same. AV> I notice that there are ^M (Ctrl-M) characters in patches.analyzers as there AV> are some of the chars in the original sources too. Did you by any chance post AV> process the lucene sources causing them to lose their ^M chars ? (the patch AV> files have to match the sources). nope, i do not process them. maybe thats b/c i use windows. also i have updated patch program for cygwin to the latest version - patch fails :( i know that i can remove thai analyzer and build will go okay, but im wondering why does it happen... also i have found that AbstractField.java cannot be patched too. other files are fine. here is rejected chunk: AbstractField.java.rej *************** *** 15,20 **** * limitations under the License. */ /** * --- 15,21 ---- * limitations under the License. */ + import java.io.Reader; /** * *************** *** 271,274 **** result.append('>'); return result.toString(); } } --- 272,282 ---- result.append('>'); return result.toString(); } + + /* The following abstract methods were added as a workaround for GCJ bug #15411. + * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15411 + */ + public abstract String stringValue(); + public abstract Reader readerValue(); + public abstract byte[] binaryValue(); } -- Yura Smolsky _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
