TJ Ninneman said: > On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Bill Janssen wrote: > >> Erik Groeneveld <erik at cq2.nl> wrote: >> >>> But I admit that after the major >>> strategy change that involved using JCC instead of GCJ, I am >>> switching >>> to a different GCJ solution. Probably other do so as well? > > What solution? > >> Nope. I dislike the JVM, particularly its handling of memory, so I >> share your pain, > > Agreed, my memory consumption went up by almost a full order of > magnitude. > > With that being said, the new JCC based one just rocks in almost every > way. Even when I would develop a pure python, multi-threaded server > with GCJ PyLucene I invariably would have constant problems. Now I > can run my code within a rock solid mod_wsgi Apache server and I never > have issues. > > It's a beautiful thing...RAM is cheap, downtime isn't.
Thank you for the kind words :) Andi.. _______________________________________________ pylucene-dev mailing list pylucene-dev@osafoundation.org http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
