Wataru,

I would tend to go with the 9800 if cost is not an issue -- it is a
faster card than the 9600.  Both work great with flat panels (though
you'll need a CRT for stereo).

Also, I've found that the 9600 does not support antialiased lines on the
G5, much to my disappointment.  I do now know whether or not the 9800
suffers this same limitation.  Perhaps others can comment?

There were some glitches with Stereo on the ATI series of cards, but
these may have been fixed by now.

Cheers,
Warren

--
mailto:war...@delanoscientific.com
Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist
DeLano Scientific LLC
Voice (650)-346-1154 
Fax   (650)-593-4020

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:pymol-users-
> ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of wkag...@jota.gsc.riken.go.jp
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:50 AM
> To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [PyMOL] recommendations for G5
> 
> Dear staff (and pymol users):
> 
> I am looking for some suggestions on the power mac G5 hardware to run
> pymol and other 3D applications without problems.
> Between the two graphic cards offered by Apple (ATI Radeon 9600 pro or
> 9800 pro), which do you recommend?  Is it too risky to buy the 9800
pro
> because of compatibility problems?  How well does the Apple's flat
> panel display work with those graphic cards?  What are other flat
panel
> displays that work with those graphic cards?
> 
> I'm sorry these questions are not directly related to pymol, but I
> appreciate any suggestions.
> 
> Wataru Kagawa
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference &
Expo
> The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The
Enterprise
> Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room
> http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users


Reply via email to