Ben,

Granted -- and there are certain times when it makes sense for everyone
to be "wrong" in order to be consistent.  But is this one such case?  I
think not.  If DSSP "helices" aren't actually helices, then of what use
is the standard?  Neither the resulting statistics nor the cartoon
figures will be correct.

I've put up one particularly egregious DSSP example on the web at 

http://www.pymol.org/not_helix

for inspection.  If you are comfortable with obvious turn regions (such
as this one) being assigned as helix, then by all means, go right ahead
and continue using DSSP via rTools or the PDB.

But for me, I am not going to lose sleep over deviating from an existing
standard in PyMOL.  As I said before, the DSSP paper wasn't even written
in such a way as to enable exact reproduction of their research other
than by running their proprietary (1000 EURO) software program or by
analyzing their source code. 

PyMOL's new "dss" algorithm is nowhere near validated enough to become a
standard, but I do think that if we are going to agree upon a standard
for secondary structure assignment, that the standard should reflect
common notions of secondary structure, be exactly described, be
reproducible, and be available in an open-source reference
implementation.  Does DSSP meet these criteria?  No, but STRIDE might
(if one could find it), and "dss" probably could in time. 

Cheers,
Warren

--
mailto:war...@delanoscientific.com
Warren L. DeLano, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist
DeLano Scientific LLC
Voice (650)-346-1154 
Fax   (650)-593-4020

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net 
> [mailto:pymol-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Ben Hitz
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:28 AM
> To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [PyMOL] DSSP
> 
> 
> Warren -
> The advantage of using DSSP over another heuristic method, is 
> that it is a standard. A DSSP helix is a DSSP helix 
> everywhere, even if a crystallographer might extend the end a bit.
> 
> Ben
> --
> Ben Hitz                                    Exelixis
> Computational Biology and Informatics
> bh...@exelixis.com                   650-837-8137
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. 
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/p> ymol-users
> 


Reply via email to