Hi Jack,

you could render the labels to a separate image and assemble both images 
using Photoshop, Gimp, etc.

set ray_trace_mode, 1
hide labels
png image1.png, ray=1

set ray_trace_mode, 0
as labels
set label_font_id, 7
set label_size, 20
set label_color, black
set label_outline_color, white
png image2.png, ray=1

Cheers,
   Thomas

Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote, On 10/15/11 08:13:
> Hi Jack,
> 
> Unfortunately, that is not possible. The ray-trace mode affects the
> behaviour/display of edges during raytracing, It's basically doing
> edge detection, similar to what can be done in image processing
> afterwards. So, it's similar to having an image and wanting to enhance
> edges on some, but not on other objects, using photoshop or so. It's
> impossible to do that automatically.
> 
> In principle, it would be possible to modify the behaviour of the
> raytracer, though. But I think it would require quite a bit of effort
> coding that. But it could be interesting, also to use different line
> colors for different selections :)
> 
> Sorry,
> 
> Tsjerk
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jack Orford <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Is there a way to stop ray_trace_mode 1 putting an outline on labels?  
>> Although the outline looks quite good for the graphics, especially once they 
>> are printed, it makes the text look like blocky typewriter font.  Any advice 
>> appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks

-- 
Thomas Holder
MPI for Developmental Biology
Spemannstr. 35
D-72076 Tübingen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list ([email protected])
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to