Hi James.

I think it is because you create a object, which have
identical ID's in the object.

new:
2x ID 7, 2x 5
and so on.

hide label, all
label new, index
hide label, all
label new, id

either use the index, to make selections
alter the chain name for one of the fragments, before creation

or so.

/T


Troels Emtekær Linnet
Slotsvej 2
4300 Holbæk
Mobil: +45 60210234



2011/12/15 James Davidson <j.david...@vernalis.com>

>  **
> Dear All,
>
> I am currently having a problem with the distance command when applied to
> merged objects.  The real case is actually when I remove a ligand from a
> binding site and merge in a new ligand.  But as a simple example, I think I
> can demonstrate with the following:
>
> >frag ala, ala1
> >frag ala, ala2
> >translate [4,0,0], ala2
> >label all, ID
> >distance d1, ala1 & ID 3, ala2 & ID 0
>
> This creates a distance object fine.  But if I now merge the two objects
> into a new object:
>
> >create new, ala1 | ala2
> >disable ala1 | ala2
>
> and manually create two single atom selections corresponding to the
> original ID 3 and ID 0 atoms (using atom select mode and renaming the
> selections to give 'sele1' and 'sele2'):
>
> >distance d2, sele1, sele2
>
> gives me a distance between ID 0 and 3 both on what used to be ala2, and
> not between the two selected atoms!
>
>
> Am I doing something wrong with 'create'?  I don't recall having a problem
> with this sort of operation until maybe ~ 6 months ago...  I am using rev
> 3971 under Windows.  Any help/advice greatly appreciated.
>
> Kind regards
>
> James
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> PLEASE READ: This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is
> intended for the named addressee(s) only and access to it by anyone else is
> unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
> contents of this email or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it
> is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in
> error, please notify the sender or postmas...@vernalis.com. Email is not
> a secure method of communication and the Company cannot accept
> responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any
> attachment(s). Please check this email for virus infection for which the
> Company accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought
> then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated, any views or
> opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent
> those of the Company.
>
> The Vernalis Group of Companies
> Oakdene Court
> 613 Reading Road
> Winnersh, Berkshire
> RG41 5UA.
> Tel: +44 118 977 3133
>
> To access trading company registration and address details, please go to
> the Vernalis website at www.vernalis.com and click on the "Company
> address and registration details" link at the bottom of the page..
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
> This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits?
> Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
> _______________________________________________
> PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
> Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.  
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity 
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More! 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/
_______________________________________________
PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to