hmm, I got some useful feedback, and rather than the shape proposed in item 4 below, it was pointed out that we are building separate packages and that we should build them properly.
This would mean we'd see things more like: pyogp.apps pyogp.lib.agentdomain pyogp.lib.base pyogp.lib.client pyogp.test.interop While the namespace pyogp encompasses a suite of similarly oriented packages, each package itself is distinct. Btw, docs makes no sense as a separate module, docs should be embedded in each package separately. Let's be pythonic, and conform to: http://docs.python.org/distutils/introduction.html 4. change the shape of the package. Proposal is as follows: > pyogp/ base namespace > - apps/ base location for published > scipts/apps using pyogp > - examples/ sample scripts > - docs/ sphinx documentation > - lib/ base lib namespace > - base/ common library code > - client/ basic client oriented > library code > - agentdomain/ basic agentdomain oriented library > code (currently defunct) > - test/ base > integration/functional test namespace > - interop/ OGP related tests > >
_______________________________________________ Click here to unsubscribe or manage your list subscription: https://lists.secondlife.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pyogp
