Dnia 2011-11-22, wto o godzinie 13:48 -0500, Andreas Kloeckner pisze:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:23:58 +0100, Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I am writing with rather naive question, but what is
> > the status of those two, and when can we expect new
> > stable version?
> > 
> > I am asking this because I am trying to build Debian
> > package of PyOpenCL. Finally Debian has AMD/ATI OpenCL
> > library, so I want to change PyOpenCL package to take
> > this into consideration and not to require NVIDIA OpenCL
> > libraries. For now, PyOpenCL tests crash:
> > 
> > ============================= test session starts
> > ==============================
> > platform linux2 -- Python 2.7.2 -- pytest-1.3.4
> > test path 1: test_array.py
> > 
> > test_array.py E
> > 
> > ==================================== ERRORS
> > ====================================
> >  ERROR collecting /usr/src/cuda/pyopencl/pyopencl-2011.1.2
> > +git20111121/test/test_array.py 
> > test_array.py:669: in <module>
> > >   register_dtype(mmc_dtype, "minmax_collector")
> > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pyopencl/compyte/dtypes.py:50: in
> > register_dtype
> > >                   % (dtype, DTYPE_TO_NAME[dtype], ", ".join(c_names)))
> > E           RuntimeError: dtype '[('cur_min', '<i4'), ('cur_max',
> > '<i4'), ('pad', '<i4')]' already registered (as 'minmax_collector', new
> > names 'minmax_collector')
> > =========================== 1 error in 0.21 seconds
> > ============================
> > 
> > So my question is - should I just wait for few days till situation
> > gets better, or is this more serious, requiring more time to fix,
> > and I should just package older version for now?
> 
> This failure should be fixed in current git.

I have this error with c2c4040c1e52c2461864e56ce96f70806413b33c,
which is current according to my git client.

>  Compyte will only be in the
> release *after* the next stable. I've slogged through the remaining test
> failures this past weekend, so I think I'm ready to release 2011.2 this
> (long, in the US) weekend. So I'd recommend waiting with package
> building if you can.

OK, thanks for the information. I can (and will wait).

Regards.

-- 
Tomasz Rybak <[email protected]> GPG/PGP key ID: 2AD5 9860
Fingerprint A481 824E 7DD3 9C0E C40A  488E C654 FB33 2AD5 9860
http://member.acm.org/~tomaszrybak

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
PyOpenCL mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pyopencl

Reply via email to