On Fri, May 18, 2018, 06:08 Dustin Ingram, <dustin.ing...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I did reach out to the one contact we had there from when GCP/Fastly
> were having issues that affected Travis/PyPI (Emma) on Monday, but got
> no response.
>

If Travis doesn't work out then let Steve Dower and me know and we can see
if we can get you extra credits on VSTS (teammate of mine was already
working with Jason at the PyCon sprints to get setuptools up on
PyPA.visualstudio.com).

-Brett


> D.
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sumana Harihareswara <s...@changeset.nyc>
> wrote:
> > In my opinion, this kind of bottleneck is likely to happen more
> frequently as we increase PyPA development activity, so it'd be worth
> asking Travis to bump up our account's oomph. (I am very tired and on a
> train so please forgive handwavy wording.) Do we have a contact there?
> >
> > --
> > Sumana Harihareswara
> > Changeset Consulting
> > https://changeset.nyc
> >
> > On 05/16/2018 04:36 PM, Dustin Ingram wrote:
> >> Thanks for the report. I reverted the commit that caused this in
> >> https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/pull/4015, however it might take a
> >> bit for this to get deployed to PyPI because there's currently a
> >> pretty long backlog in Travis due to all the PyPA development
> >> happening during the sprints.
> >>
> >> D.
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Alex Becker <alcubec...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> In the last hour I started observing the following loop:
> >>>
> >>> https://pypi.org/pypi/nonexistant-package/json ->
> >>> https://pypi.org/pypi/nonexistant-package/json/ ->
> >>> https://pypi.org/pypi/nonexistant-package/json
> >>>
> >>> This is breaking pipenv package resolution for us, since we use 2
> different
> >>> indices and it checks for a 404 from PyPI before going on to the
> second one.
> >>> I assume any pipenv or pip user relying on multiple indices is
> currently
> >>> unable to resolve packages.
>

Reply via email to