Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r3764:688124a7ffb1
Date: 2011-06-21 11:45 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/688124a7ffb1/

Log:    add a small note about numpy and prolog

diff --git a/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex b/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex
--- a/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex
+++ b/talk/iwtc11/paper.tex
@@ -956,12 +956,13 @@
 peeling gives an additional XXX on average, which makes benchmark times
 comparable with native-compiled C code. Missing performance we attribute to
 the relative immaturity of PyPy's JIT assembler backend as well as missing
-optimizations, like instruction scheduling. Results:
+optimizations, like instruction scheduling.
 
-
-
-XXX add a small note somewhere that numpy and prolog are helped by this
-optimization
+Other interesting interpreters that are helped greatly by this
+optimization are for
+example our Prolog interpreter written in RPython, as well as numerical
+kernel used for array manipulation. The exact extent is out of scope for
+this paper.
 
 \section{Related Work}
 \label{sec:related}
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
pypy-commit@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit

Reply via email to