Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>
Branch: numppy-flatitter
Changeset: r51494:3a1f1a964ab4
Date: 2012-01-19 19:10 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/3a1f1a964ab4/

Log:    add REVIEW

diff --git a/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW b/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+* I think we should wait for indexing-by-arrays-2, since this would clean up
+  the iterator interface
+
+* I commited a failing test, it seems the entire approach is pretty doomed.
+  Instead we should keep the parent iterator (and not create a OneDim one)
+
+* For getitem, we need to reuse parent getitem, but with some hook
+  that recomputes indexes. That hook would be used for any sort of access,
+  be it slices or be it integers, but in general I would like to avoid code
+  duplication, since the indexing is getting slowly fairly complex.
\ No newline at end of file
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
pypy-commit@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit

Reply via email to