Author: Armin Rigo <[email protected]>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r328:ec3e1b912cd9
Date: 2012-02-13 10:21 +0100
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy.org/changeset/ec3e1b912cd9/

Log:    Complete

diff --git a/source/performance.txt b/source/performance.txt
--- a/source/performance.txt
+++ b/source/performance.txt
@@ -75,7 +75,10 @@
   that replace 10 lines of Python loops (longer but arguably much easier
   to read).  The pure Python version is generally not slower even on
   CPython, and on PyPy it allows the JIT to work much better --- simple
-  Python code is fast.
+  Python code is fast.  The same argument also applies to ``filter()``,
+  ``reduce()``, and to some extend ``map()`` (although the simple case
+  is JITted), and to all usages of the ``operator`` module we can think
+  of.
 
 We generally consider things that are slower on PyPy than CPython to be bugs
 of PyPy.  If you find some issue that is not documented here,
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit

Reply via email to