Author: Carl Friedrich Bolz <[email protected]>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r4418:c5846fca07f9
Date: 2012-08-06 09:17 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/c5846fca07f9/
Log: address the prolog comment
diff --git a/talk/dls2012/paper.tex b/talk/dls2012/paper.tex
--- a/talk/dls2012/paper.tex
+++ b/talk/dls2012/paper.tex
@@ -863,13 +863,6 @@
practice, and that might be worth noting.
}
-\revb{
-Section 7 also mentions performance improvements for a Prolog
-interpreter. Consider adding a brief explanation of the benefit, since
-that example stands out as a non-numeric (I assume) performance
-improvement.
-}
-
\revc{
Providing source code for the benchmarks measured are needed for others to
reproduce and build on your results. I believe this should be the minimum
@@ -1027,11 +1020,12 @@
the relative immaturity of PyPy's JIT assembler backend as well as missing
optimizations, like instruction scheduling.
-Other interesting interpreters that are helped greatly by this
-optimization are for
-example our Prolog interpreter written in RPython, as well as numerical
-kernel used for array manipulation. The exact extent is out of scope for
-this paper.
+Other interesting interpreters that are helped greatly by this optimization are
+for example our Prolog interpreter written in RPython
+\cite{carl_friedrich_bolz_towards_2010}. Prolog programs often contain tight
+loops that perform list processing. Furthermore we experimented with a language
+for writing numerical kernel used for array manipulation. The exact extent is
+out of scope for this paper.
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related}
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit
