Author: Richard Plangger <planri...@gmail.com>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r5691:b41a888f410e
Date: 2016-08-30 08:20 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/b41a888f410e/

Log:    updates plan to impl extended slicing next

diff --git a/planning/py3.5/2016-august-progress.rst 
b/planning/py3.5/2016-august-progress.rst
--- a/planning/py3.5/2016-august-progress.rst
+++ b/planning/py3.5/2016-august-progress.rst
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@
 
 * Implement changes to memory view. e.g. hex(): 
https://bugs.python.org/issue9951 (plan_rich)
   Seems to work, but test suite hangs to verify the CPython tests.
-* tuple indexing for memory view (plan_rich)
+* tuple indexing for memory view, !will be merged soon! (plan_rich)
   Comments: Stronly tied to numpy. Hard to implement, because most of the 
basics are missing (dimensions/strides)
   We should make a plan to impl. that on default with cpyext support and merge 
it back to py3.5.
   Matti's opinion on that would be great!
+* plan_rich: extended slicing for memory view
 
 * arigo: look at test failures relaced to os.scandir() or the pathlib
   module, or the enum module
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
pypy-commit@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit

Reply via email to