Author: Armin Rigo <[email protected]>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r5761:ea8c2e49fcfb
Date: 2016-12-06 12:44 +0100
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/ea8c2e49fcfb/
Log: python-dev confirmed the strange repr for recursive deques
diff --git a/planning/py3.5/cpython-crashers.rst
b/planning/py3.5/cpython-crashers.rst
--- a/planning/py3.5/cpython-crashers.rst
+++ b/planning/py3.5/cpython-crashers.rst
@@ -184,9 +184,6 @@
# 'frame'; and we've seen that it is non-empty
# as long as we don't read frame.f_locals.
-* _collectionsmodule.c: deque_repr uses "[...]" as repr if recursion is
- detected. I'd suggest that "deque(...)" is clearer---it's not a list.
-
* weak dicts (both kinds) and weak sets have an implementation of
__len__ which doesn't give the "expected" result on PyPy, and in some
cases on CPython too. I'm not sure what is expected and what is not.
_______________________________________________
pypy-commit mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-commit