Sorry, really ought to learn how to use email! Obviously none of the intended parties got this. :-(
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:39:46 +0100 (BST) From: Richard Emslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pypy-svn] r5649 - pypy/trunk/src/pypy
Hi Michael!
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mwh Date: Sat Jul 24 18:39:01 2004 New Revision: 5649
Modified: pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO Log: Random updates.
In my working tree I've commented out the code that prints interpreter- level tracebacks and have yet to miss them. Should I check this in?
Think I got rid of also in traceinteractive.py... if that counts for my vote ;-)
Modified: pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO ============================================================================== --- pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO (original)
[schnip]
* improve traceobjectspace! currently it only catches calls from outside the space into the space but not the ones where space operations involve calling more space - operations (the latter are not traced)! + operations (the latter are not traced)! (fixed?)
AFAIK yes! I've got some changes to checkin still (testit.py was broken and changing verbosity from traceinteractive.py)
Should we combine interactive.py and traceinteractive.py ? (Since trace one was a blatant copy and paste hack :-) - also a TODO I believe). We could make interpreter level tracebacks a verbosity option?
Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
