Mark Hahn wrote:
...
I know the real PyPy with all its goals is a long way out, but I don't need all the goals PyPy does. Instead of an automatic translation to C using your flow-graph tool, I could do a manual port to c# in the beginning. Or maybe I'll take longer and actually work on the auto-translation to C#. Also I would be starting full-time now, not later.
Sure. Any useful fast path makes sense. You can also try to use the C translation and put a C# transformation on top of it, or modify it. If that leads to a C# code generator for the project, it will be a win. Or you do a direct manual thing first, to get things flying. After all, having more supported target engines and more target languages is good for the project.
It would be ironic to have the first implementation of PyPy not be Python and not on CPython. It could be kind of a test run for the real PyPy.
No problem if we start with IronicPython. :-)
Maybe when I wake up in the morning I will come to my senses and get over this crazy idea.
I wish you a very good sleep -- chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
