Armin Rigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question is which line of work to focus on right now. All of > these back-ends are interesting and worthwhile in the long run but > we need to select a first one. There are basically 4 reasonable > options: > > * Enhance genc.py.
> * Enhance genc.py using the C++ facility of function overloading for > simplicity > * Go for genllvm.py. > * genjava.py could be another option. A question that springs to mind is: How much work do these various options share? (It seems like your typer.py is exactly this kind of work). Also, I think that the benefits of function overloading are pretty minor for the cost of demanding a c++ compiler (although you could probably use cfront and tcc for that :). Cheers, mwh -- Whaaat? That is the most retarded thing I have seen since, oh, yesterday -- Kaz Kylheku, comp.lang.lisp _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
