Armin Rigo wrote:
This check-in is not about anything that would have required any more design. I wrote this just to expose the few functions we already have to app-level, for what it's worth. It's funny to call stackless.cstack_frames_depth() from app-level to see how many C stack frames a normal Python function call costs. I suppose the app-level module name 'stackless' triggered some reaction that I did not intend, sorry for that.
Yes, it probably did. This apeared to me like another show-case how easy it is to get the stackless functionality in if things are just done right. This is also related to some problems with my family in general and my son specifically causing trouble in school, and I read the check-in messages in that mood. Sorry about that from my side. ciao - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tismerysoft GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9A : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 30 80 90 57 05 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
