[EMAIL PROTECTED] (holger krekel) writes: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 15:15 +0100, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote: >> Will the .NET backend use the ootypesystem (which is what gensqueak >> uses) or the lltypesystem (which is what genllvm, genc and genjavascript >> uses)? I guess for C# the former would make more sense, but I have no >> clue how low-level IL is (I don't really have any clue about .NET at all >> :-). > > at first i also thought that ootypesystem might make sense - but then > i considered that the Intermediate Language is statically typed > and so far i guess it's more similar to our LLVM backend > then to a Squeak backend. But i am not aware of all the involved > details so i might guess wrong.
I don't really know much about the CLI either, but I think we want RPython classes to be CLI classes to allow interaction with other CLI languages and frameworks, and that means using the ootypesystem. > And i agree with Carl that considering to simply work within our > common pypy/translator directory is sensible and improves feedback > possibilities. Me too. Cheers, mwh -- This proposal, if accepted, will probably mean a heck of a lot of work for somebody. But since I don't want it accepted, I don't care. -- Laura Creighton, PEP 666 _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
