On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 18:23 +0200, Armin Rigo wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:58:09PM +0200, holger krekel wrote:
> > I agree but may have a somewhat different idea in mind when
> > talking about a more implicit model: (...)
>
> Ok, then we agree everywhere -- short of a confusing terminology: we
> gave the names "implicit levels" and "explicit levels" to very precise
> things and now you're calling "an implicit model" something that is
> inbetween :-)
indeed, i wasn't quite explicit enough, i guess :)
IMO "implicit" and "explicit" do not denote a binary property
but there rather can be quantities of "implicit" or "explicit",
therefore the "more" in "more implicit model".
holger
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
