On 29.03.2007, at 19:23, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:16:36PM +0200, Christian Tismer wrote: >> Shortly put: anything that needs to seriously change the annotator >> should not be considered. Some syntactic sugar does not hurt. >> >> You think even that makes no sense, right? At least it should not >> hurt... > > I think it hurts because it's obscure to describe: "you can write > str(x) > and x.__str__() will be called, but if you write str([x]) then > x.__str__() will not be called"...
I agree that we disagree. Very much. Having no solution instead of a partial one for 80% of the common cases is mathematically correct, but nothing to tell users. And I honor and do appreciate them. not yet branching - ly y'rs -- chris _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
