Hi Peter, On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:29:00AM +1300, Peter Fraser wrote: > 1. Suppose you ran the PyPy-C interpreter as a CPython extension. Could > the extension release the CPython GIL?
Yes. The part of your argument which seems confusing, though, is that you don't really need to have one CPython and one PyPy in order to run Python code on two CPUs in parallel. You don't gain much (except confusion) by running one CPython and one PyPy for this purpose. (There are other reasons why you might want to do that, like using some special PyPy feature in a subpart of your CPython application.) In fact, the only restriction is that putting two CPythons in the same process is not really possible. Aside from that, you could do any of the following: * run several CPythons in two different processes and communicate using pipes, or shared memory, etc. * run several PyPys in either the same or different processes An advantage of PyPy over CPython in this domain is that because multiple PyPys can run in the same process you could experiment with communication models based on in-process shared data and locks. A bientot, Armin _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
