I agree that new approaches to concurrency would be cool. Possible SoCers might start by looking at PARELY (an actor model impl for python that runs on PyPy as is). http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley/
Regards, Paul On 3/18/08, Jakub Gustak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What do you all think of these ideas? Are there other ideas around? I > > know that Jakub posted something a while ago (haven't looked in detail > > yet, though). In my opinion we should try to avoid "yet another > > incomplete interpreter implentation" for this year. > > > I fully agree. > > Still, what I proposed was not attempt to create another one, but keep > existing one alive. > It is bothering me, that scheme interpreter is incomplete, but the > problem is, i could not > find a use case for it (except of Thousand Parsecs internal scripting > language - if none > other - faster - scheme implementation available). > > So if PyPy is such a nice platform to experiment, let's do it, and > play with different > approaches to implement parallel paradigms, or whatsoever. There is no > need for yet another > scheme interpreter (even complete) if it doesn't have any interesting features. > That's my 3 cents for now. > > Cheers, > > Jakub Gustak > > _______________________________________________ > pypy-dev@codespeak.net > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
