holger krekel wrote:
> I am sure that when the time comes we'll find good use uses
> for a robust virtualized embeddable Python Interpreter.
> Having people or parties already asking for it (or better yet,
> investing into it :-) would certainly accelerate it.
What sort of investment would be needed for something that worked like
RestrictedPython but was implemented in a way that you guys would be
happy to support and also had controllable memory and processor usage
and that behaved like a normal python library from the end user's point
of view?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
