On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Severin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> safethread sound like something interesting. are there already any safthread >> ideas in pypy? >> In general, working on GILless ideas sounds more interesting than doing >> something on multiprocess framworks. >> It's a master thesis, that means there is room for experimental stuff, but >> in the end half a year is quite short, so the room is limited again :) >> was there any attempt to remove the GIL in pypy so far? >> -- >> Severin >> > > None that I know of at least. I think any serious GIL-removal proposal > requires some deeper thinking about what exactly are the expected > semantics.
Oi, how did I miss this thread before... Python-safethread's design of course includes most of this deep thinking. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
