Armin, I'll take a look at PyPy. However, it's likely we will use our existing naive compiler as the basis for the PBC compiler, since it works within the context of our Antlr grammar, including supporting infrastructure like incremental parses, as well as some other scaffolding like scopes compilation.
Thanks! - Jim On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Armin Rigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:53:08PM -0600, Jim Baker wrote: > > Naturally, the PBC-VM will be much easier to test once we implement a PBC > > compiler. For the moment, we just use the pycimport module, which > provides > > for an alternate load path. > > Then I can (again) suggest that you look at PyPy instead of rewriting > your own .pyc compiler from scratch -- but that might not be quite what > you are looking for, given that (as I understand it) writing PBC would > be mostly an extension of your own Python-to-Java compiler. > Nevertheless, I'm sure that if you want to try that path, you can try to > extract code from PyPy, and plug it in Jython either in the form of pure > Python code or compiled Java code. > > > Armin > > -- Jim Baker [email protected]
_______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
