Ok, so I did my homework and performed a couple of checks: * it seems to mostly work on a couple of examples that I checked
* I was a bit comparing aples to oranges (python 2.6 vs xtpython 3.1), but it basically gives a bit of speedup (10%-2x) over loops which do stuff. * checking it on almost anything but stuff written by hand makes no sense since it's 3.1 * result binary is 64bit only. On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >>> >>> As usual with such products, we don't know if they implemented 100% >>> python or 99%. >>> Can they run existing apps? >>> >>> Basically, the whitepaper as it is, is not a scientific experiment >>> because one is >>> unable to reproduce results. I would simply ignore it until someone >>> has something >>> to show. >> >> a) they provide a binary > > oops, found. > >> b) they say that they can run the CPython test-suite >> >> Let's please not randomly bash projects that we don't know enough about. The >> whitepaper seems to make sense, technically. It would be a lot of work to >> implement, but maybe somebody sat down and did just that. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Carl Friedrich >> > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
