On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:38 +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know how hard it is to support new libraries, > for example (probably far from the simplest, but would certainly > be cool to have - kind) pygtk (+pygobject, etc...)
I think that pygtk/pygobject are generated mostly automatically through glib introspect scripts. If so, it would be on the easy side of a hard problem. > Could someone help in finding what would be needed to get > that one(s) working ? Maybe with an approximate estimation > of the difficulty of each step, or what kind of required knowledge > to have. > In case it would be too early to attempt such project, a slight > explanation of what are the blocking points. > > That kind of information could (should ?) be added to wiki or FAQ, > as a honey-pot for new contributors... > > The help could simply be a pointer to the obvious documentation > that I managed to miss I think pypy/doc/rffi.txt is what you are looking for, but I could be completely off base since I have not done anything like this myself as of yet. > u...@host:~/repo/svn/pypy-trunk/pypy/translator/goal$ ./pypy-c -c 'import > pygtk' > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "?", line 33, in run_toplevel > File "?", line 349, in run_it > File "<string>", line 1, in <module> > ImportError: No module named pygtk > Terrence _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
